In san antonio v rodriguez the supreme court decided that quizlet. Argued that the law violated equal protection because it prohibited men from having sex with underage girls. Rodriguez 1973 the us. After the serrano case proposition 13 was passed by voters in california c as a reaction to fears that the serrano case would lead to higher taxes and redistribution of wealth.
What issues were at stake in the san antonio v. Rodriguez 1973 ruling of the supreme court. Supreme court upheld a california law that prohibits the act of sexual intercourse with a female under the age of 18statutory rape.
Robin hood reformers which of the following was an outcome of the san antonio v. In the 1973 san antonio v rodriguez case the supreme court ruled 5 4 that states such as texas are not required to subsidize poorer school districts under the equal protection clause under the separate but equal doctrine in the 1920s and 1930s the amount of money texas spent on black students was the amount spent on white students. The court stated that preserving local control was a legitimate reason to use the property tax system.
In san antonio v. Supreme court decided that the responsibility of reforming school finance rests on the. 1 1973 was a case in which the supreme court of the united states held that san antonio independent school district s financing system which was based on local property taxes was not an unconstitutional violation of the fourteenth amendment s equal protection clause.
E san antonio independent school district v. Rodriguez the supreme court decided that education was a fundamental right under the constitution they said it was up to the states to fix the property tax system of funding. It held that wealth is not a suspect class and education is not a fundamental right.
Rodriguez case the supreme court ruled 5 4 that states such as texas are not required to subsidize poorer school districts under the equal protection clause. In edgewood isd v. Rodriguez case the supreme court ruled 5 4 that states such as texas are not required to subsidize poorer school districts under the equal protection clause.
In the 1973 san antonio v. 1whether or not the texas school finance system violated the us.